Newer comments will be added to the bottom of the page.
I know we're doing a fetish thing here but to be -fair-, her kid isn't really her kid, and I feel like morally it kinda sucks but Samus isn't responsible for her, the deadbeat mom is.
I don't know why I had to post this.
Yeah I kind of agree...but I trying to make my version samus less jerkass since that is a common complete of my portrayal of her.
I'm just saying, I think it sucks for the kid but I don't think Samus would be a jerk for not taking responsibility for the kid herself in part because she was a product of something incredibly invasive done to her on many levels, in part because she's not psychologically her mother in the first place. Not just dropping everything and running, but she couldn't be morally expected to raise her with the circumstances.
Like I said, it's a fetish thing, but just sayin, I guess. I'm reading into it a little too much.
Also eh, you should try to write it how you're comfortable if you ask me but I'm not really involved in this
If someone stole your sperm… somehow… to make a baby and you found out years later, would you say, "Oh well, that's got nothing to do with me. So long"? Maybe. And that might be morally sound. But most people are going to care a bit more than that. Whether there's an ethical responsibility or not, there's a more basic human drive for connection that plays a big role in such things.
I can understand it from sort of an irrational must-protect-seed standpoint, but at the same time it's a little different from the real world equivalent because her life was literally stolen by the real mother who went full deadbeat. It's like a kid conceived of [censored] but-several-times-worse. On the one hand it's believable that she would feel an attachment to her biological seed, but on the other hand I think it's also believable that it could dredge up some horrific feelings if she were forced to raise her full-time.
I'd like to just say again that we're getting way too deep into fetish ethics and I apologize for starting the discussion with that comment in the first place.
Eh I don't mind, the conversation is interesting